Leo, let's compare internet infrastructure and digital facilities in Egypt and Turkey.
Sounds interesting. A comparison of digital plumbing, as it were.
Precisely! Let's start with Egypt. Imagine live-streaming a pyramid tour from the desert. Feasible?
Possible, but challenging. Egypt's digital infrastructure is improving, but it lags behind in rural areas.
They're investing in fiber optics, though. Major cities are improving.
Yes, but outside major cities, it can be less reliable.
Now, Turkey. Istanbul, a city spanning two continents, must have excellent internet.
Turkey's urban centers are digitally well-connected, with good broadband speeds in cities like Istanbul and Ankara.
And what about smaller towns and villages?
A digital divide exists there too. Urban areas have better access than rural ones.
Beyond speed, we should consider access and cost. How expensive is internet access in both countries?
In Egypt, internet access can be relatively expensive, limiting accessibility. Turkey generally offers more affordable internet due to competition.
What about digital innovation? Are they hubs of innovation or primarily consumers of technology?
Neither is a global tech powerhouse, but both have developing tech scenes, with local startups and e-commerce platforms.
So, for a digital nomad, which country offers better internet infrastructure?
For reliable internet, Turkey, particularly in major cities, is the better choice. Egypt might be more unpredictable.
So, Turkey is currently ahead in terms of reliable internet access. Egypt is catching up, though.
Yes. Turkey has a more established digital infrastructure. Egypt is still developing its digital highway.
If you want consistent internet for streaming, Turkey is the better bet. But Egypt is improving rapidly.
Precisely. And who knows, maybe soon even the camels will have fiber-optic saddles!