Leo, let's discuss internet infrastructure and digital facilities in Cambodia and Laos.
Certainly, Mira. It will be interesting to see how these countries compare.
Starting with Cambodia, mobile internet is incredibly popular. Smartphone penetration is high, and social media usage is widespread.
That's true. Mobile internet is often a more cost-effective and practical solution than extensive fiber optic cable networks, especially given Cambodia's terrain.
But what about internet speed?
Speeds are reasonable in urban areas with 4G, but significantly slower in rural locations. Downloading large files in remote areas would be challenging.
And affordability? Is internet access readily available to the average Cambodian?
Data costs can be relatively high compared to average incomes, although this is improving.
Now, let's consider Laos. How does its digital landscape compare?
Laos has lower internet penetration and less developed infrastructure, particularly outside of Vientiane. Government control over the internet is also more pronounced.
So, slower speeds and less accessibility?
Generally, yes. Laos is investing in improvements, but progress is gradual.
If someone is planning a trip as a digital nomad, which country would be more suitable for working online?
Cambodia's urban centers offer more reliable and faster internet for work requiring heavy data usage. Laos is better suited for those seeking a digital detox.
So, Cambodia is more digitally dynamic, while Laos is more digitally relaxed.
That's a fair assessment, for now. The digital landscape is constantly evolving.
Excellent. We've covered digital infrastructure and facilities. What's next on our agenda, Leo?