Let's discuss taxation, retirement, and social rights for long-term immigrants in Israel and Malawi. These systems offer vastly different approaches.
Israel, with its advanced technology, and Malawi, the "Warm Heart of Africa," present contrasting financial landscapes. It will be interesting to compare them.
Israel employs a progressive income tax system. Higher earners pay a larger percentage. However, new immigrants, or "Olim Hadashim," benefit from a ten-year tax exemption on foreign income.
A ten-year exemption is a significant advantage. In Malawi, the system is simpler, based on PAYE (Pay As You Earn) and VAT. However, the informal economy significantly impacts the overall tax collection.
Retirement in Israel is structured. Mandatory contributions from employers and employees feed into a system providing a basic old-age pension through the National Insurance Institute (Bituach Leumi).
That sounds secure. In Malawi, a comprehensive, universal pension system is still developing. Government employees might have access to a fund, but for others, reliance is on personal savings and family support.
Israel offers comprehensive national health insurance for everyone. Unemployment benefits are also tied to work history. In Malawi, the public healthcare system exists but is often underfunded, relying heavily on international aid. Unemployment benefits are less established.
So, in Israel, healthcare and unemployment benefits are well-defined. In Malawi, access to these services depends more on personal resources and community support.
Both countries offer unique support systems for long-term immigrants, reflecting their distinct societal structures. The choice depends on individual priorities.
Israel provides a structured, comprehensive system. Malawi's approach is more community-based. Understanding these differences is crucial for anyone considering a move.
Exactly. The choice depends on personal preferences and priorities.