Israel vs Luxembourg: Taxation, Retirement and Social Rights for Long-Term Immigrants

Welcome to Jetoff.ai detailed comparison between Israel and Luxembourg, focusing specifically on the criterion of Taxation, Retirement and Social Rights for Long-Term Immigrants. This analysis aims to provide you with clear insights.

Summary & Key Insights

Pros & Cons

Israel

Pros
  • Initial tax breaks for new immigrants, Vibrant tech scene
Cons
  • Progressive income tax, VAT

Luxembourg

Pros
  • Robust public pension system, Universal healthcare
Cons
  • High tax burden, Substantial social security contributions.

Income Tax Rate for Israel is Progressive, for Luxembourg is Progressive

Taxation, Retirement and Social Rights for Long-Term Immigrants

Mira:

Let's discuss taxation, retirement, and social rights for long-term immigrants in Israel and Luxembourg. For anyone considering a long-term move, understanding these factors is crucial. Israel, with its vibrant tech scene, and Luxembourg, a financial powerhouse, offer contrasting approaches.

Leo:

Indeed. Israel offers significant tax exemptions for new immigrants ("Olim Hadashim") for ten years on foreign income and assets. This is a considerable incentive. However, the local income tax is progressive, meaning higher earners pay a larger percentage. There's also VAT (around 17%) and National Insurance Institute (Bituach Leumi) contributions for social security and healthcare.

Mira:

Regarding retirement in Israel, there are mandatory pension schemes, usually private plans linked to employment, supplemented by old-age pensions from Bituach Leumi based on contributions. The retirement age is around 67 for men and 62-64 for women.

Leo:

Luxembourg, with its high GDP per capita, has a progressive income tax system, but also strong double taxation treaties beneficial to international workers. Social security contributions are substantial, funding a robust public pension system and universal healthcare. Retirement is generally at 65. Their social safety net is comprehensive, including unemployment and family benefits, and strong labor protections.

Mira:

Israel offers initial tax breaks, then a standard progressive system. Luxembourg demands higher contributions but provides extensive public services and a strong social security system. The choice depends on prioritizing upfront benefits versus long-term security.

Leo:

Navigating these systems requires patience. Israel's initial tax incentives are attractive, while Luxembourg's higher tax burden translates to high-quality public services. The best choice depends on individual income, long-term goals, and tolerance for paperwork.

Related Comparisons